Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

J Psychiatr Res

Affiliated Mental Health Center & Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310063, China; Liangzhu Laboratory, MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University, 1369 West Wenyi Road, Hangzhou, 311121, China. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) is a newer method designed to target larger areas of the brain, but there’s currently limited evidence for its effectiveness in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
  • A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials, involving 252 patients, found that active dTMS significantly improved OCD symptoms compared to sham dTMS, with better responses noted on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale during and after treatment.
  • The results indicate that dTMS is both effective and safe for patients with treatment-resistant OCD, with no serious adverse events reported and benefits lasting for at least one month after treatment.

Article Abstract

Background: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Objective: This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dTMS for treating OCD.

Methods: Four randomized controlled trials were found by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The fixed effects meta-analysis model was used for the purpose of data merging in Stata17. The risk ratio (RR) value was used as the measure of effect size to compare response rates and dropout rates between active and sham dTMS.

Results: The meta-analysis included four randomized-controlled trials involving 252 patients with treatment-resistant OCD. Active dTMS showed a notably greater rate of response on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) in comparison to sham dTMS after treatment (Y-BOCS: RR = 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06 to 6.69) and at the one-month follow-up (Y-BOCS: RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.26). Subgroup analysis revealed that active dTMS with H-coils was more effective than sham dTMS (RR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.93 to 6.60). No serious adverse events were documented in the studies that were included.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that dTMS demonstrates notable efficacy and safety in treating patients with treatment-resistant OCD compared to sham dTMS, with sustained effectiveness noted throughout the one-month post-treatment period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transcranial magnetic
12
magnetic stimulation
12
sham dtms
12
dtms
9
deep transcranial
8
obsessive-compulsive disorder
8
randomized-controlled trials
8
effectiveness safety
8
safety dtms
8
dtms treating
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!