A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Arthroscopic reduction internal fixation for glenoid fractures: a systematic review of the outcomes and complications. | LitMetric

Arthroscopic reduction internal fixation for glenoid fractures: a systematic review of the outcomes and complications.

Musculoskelet Surg

Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Advanced arthroscopic technique, known as arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), is increasingly being used for treating glenoid fractures, providing better visualization of injury and fewer risks than traditional methods.
  • A systematic review analyzed studies from major databases to assess the functional outcomes and complications of ARIF, focusing on criteria like patient demographics, range of motion, and various outcome performance scores.
  • The review found that ARIF led to significantly improved postoperative ROWE scores in patients, while also allowing for better diagnosis of fractures and associated injuries compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Article Abstract

With the advanced arthroscopic technique, arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) is gaining popularity for Glenoid fractures with and without scapular involvement. ARIF offers a complete view of the articular surfaces and diagnoses and treats other associated injuries. ARIF provides less soft tissue trauma than open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The aim of this systemic review is to look at the functional outcomes and complications of ARIF. A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed. The search terms included "glenoid fracture" OR "scapula fracture" AND "arthroscopic fixation" OR "arthroscopy" OR "arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation". Studies were limited to English publications with reported functional outcome measures and complications. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes including range of motion, outcome performance scores including ROWE score, visual analogue scale and American shoulder and elbow surgeons score and complications were extracted. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The participants ranged in age from 41 to 48, and the mean length of follow-up ranged from 12 to 41 months postoperatively. The mean ROWE scores for the ARIF group were significantly better postoperatively. ARIF allows accurate diagnosis of the fracture pattern and associated injuries, in addition to representing a safe option to treat glenoid fractures with or without scapular fractures with fewer complications compared to ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Systematic review.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00870-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reduction internal
16
internal fixation
12
glenoid fractures
12
systematic review
12
outcomes complications
8
fractures scapular
8
associated injuries
8
arif
6
complications
5
arthroscopic reduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!