AI Article Synopsis

  • Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) are effective treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with the study comparing the effects of spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) on patient outcomes.
  • After analyzing data from 148 patients, the results showed that those under GA had lower hemoglobin drop, shorter catheterization times, and better functional outcomes 3 months post-surgery compared to those under SA.
  • Overall, while both anesthesia types are safe for endoscopic procedures, GA provided superior perioperative results, specifically in minimizing blood loss and enhancing recovery metrics.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) are safe and effective treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Spinal anesthesia (SA) is widely used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) in place of general anesthesia (GA). We aimed to assess the impact of GA vs. SA on blood loss, postoperative course and functional outcomes after HoLEP and B-TUEP.

Methods: After propensity score matching, we analyzed data from 148 patients treated with EEP in our centre for symptomatic BPH. We recorded patient's characteristics, procedural data, type of anesthesia (SA vs. GA). Postoperatively we evaluated hemoglobin drop, catheterization time (CT), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Functional outcomes were evaluated with the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) at baseline and 3 months after surgery. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models tested the association between anesthesia type and EEP outcomes.

Results: After matching groups were comparable in terms of pre- and intra-operative variables. Of all, 111 (75%) patients were treated under SA. Haemoglobin drop was lower in GA compared to SA group (1 vs. 1.4 g/dL, p < 0.01). CT was shorter in the GA group (1 vs. 2 days, p = 0.01). Postoperative IPSS score was lower in GA group (4 vs. 8, p = 0.04). Multivariable linear regression models revealed that prostate volume (p = 0.01) and SA vs. GA (p = 0.01) were associated with higher haemoglobin drop, after accounting for age and use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets. Similarly, SA vs. GA (p = 0.02) and postoperative complications occurrence (p < 0.001) were associated with a longer LOS, after accounting for age, prostate volume and use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets.

Conclusion: EEP can be safely performed under both GA and SA. GA offers better outcomes in terms of perioperative bleeding and 3-month functional outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05271-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enucleation prostate
16
functional outcomes
12
general anesthesia
8
spinal anesthesia
8
anesthesia endoscopic
8
endoscopic enucleation
8
patients treated
8
anesthesia
5
prostate
5
anesthesia associated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!