An innovative tool to prioritize the assessment of investigational COVID-19 therapeutics: A pilot project.

Can Commun Dis Rep

Infectious Diseases and Vaccination Programs Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Public Health Agency of Canada faced a challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic in managing numerous investigational therapeutics and needed an effective way to prioritize their assessment.
  • They created the Rapid Scoring Tool (RST) through a literature search and validation process, aiming to streamline the review of potential treatments based on specific criteria.
  • The RST, which utilizes a unique scoring system from -10 to 10, effectively ranks therapeutics and can adapt to evolving information, indicating its potential for broader applications in future health crises.

Article Abstract

Background: As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, hundreds of investigational COVID-19 therapeutics emerged. Maintaining situational awareness of this extensive and rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape represented an unprecedented challenge for the Public Health Agency of Canada, as it worked to promote and protect the health of Canadians. A tool to triage and prioritize the assessment of these therapeutics was needed.

Methods: The objective was to develop and conduct an initial validation of a tool to identify investigational COVID-19 therapeutics for further review based on an efficient preliminary assessment, using a systematic and reliable process that would be practical to validate, implement and update. Phase 1 of this pilot project consisted of a literature search to identify existing COVID-19 therapeutic assessment prioritization tools, development of the Rapid Scoring Tool (RST) and initial validation of the tool.

Results: No tools designed to rank investigational COVID-19 therapeutics for the purpose of prioritizing their assessment were identified. However, a few publications provided criteria to consider and therapeutic ranking methods, which helped shape the development of the RST. The RST included eight criteria and several descriptors ("characteristics"). A universal characteristic scoring scale from -10 to 10 was developed. The sum of all the characteristic scores yielded an overall benefit score for each therapeutic. The RST appropriately ranked therapeutics using a systematic, reliable and practical approach.

Conclusion: Phase 1 was successfully completed. The RST presents several distinct aspects compared with other tools, including its scoring scale and method, and capacity to factor in incomplete or pending information. It is anticipated that the framework used for the RST will lend itself to use in other dynamic situations involving many interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v50i10a04DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

investigational covid-19
16
covid-19 therapeutics
16
prioritize assessment
8
pilot project
8
initial validation
8
systematic reliable
8
scoring scale
8
covid-19
6
therapeutics
6
rst
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!