AI Article Synopsis

  • CYP2C19 loss of function carriers face a higher risk of ischemic events when treated with clopidogrel during PCI.
  • In the TAILOR-PCI study, patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel or a genotype-guided therapy where LOF carriers were prescribed ticagrelor.
  • Although direct medical costs were similar between the two groups, total costs were higher for the GG group mainly due to the more expensive ticagrelor medication.

Article Abstract

CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) carriers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of ischemic events when treated with clopidogrel. PCI patients in TAILOR-PCI were randomized to clopidogrel or genotype-guided (GG) therapy in which LOF carriers received ticagrelor and non-carriers clopidogrel. Direct medical costs associated with a GG approach have not been described before. TAILOR-PCI participants for whom direct medical costs were available for the duration from the date of PCI to one-year post PCI were included. Primary cost estimates were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Cost Data Warehouse. There were no differences in direct medical costs between the GG and clopidogrel groups (mean $20,682 versus $19,747, p = 0.11) however total costs were greater in the GG group (mean $21,245 versus $19,891, p = 0.02) which was primarily driven by ticagrelor costs. In conclusion the increased expense of a GG strategy post PCI as compared to clopidogrel for all is primarily driven by the cost of ticagrelor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41397-024-00353-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct medical
12
percutaneous coronary
8
coronary intervention
8
lof carriers
8
medical costs
8
post pci
8
pci
5
clopidogrel
5
cost
4
cost analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!