AI Article Synopsis

  • Extreme events like the credit crunch and the COVID-19 pandemic share the theme that they were unexpected despite prior warnings or signs.
  • Risk assessments often fail because they only account for known factors, leaving unknown uncertainties unaddressed.
  • The article advocates for incorporating "unknowledge" into risk assessment frameworks, encouraging assessors to recognize and evaluate what they don't know to better prepare for surprises.

Article Abstract

Extreme events like the credit crunch, the September 11th attacks, the coronavirus pandemic, and Hamas' attack on Israel each have in common that they should not have come as a surprise, yet still did. One reason surprises happen is that a risk assessment reflects the knowledge of the assessors, yet risk also includes uncertainties that extend beyond this knowledge. A risk assessment is thus susceptible to surprises as it focuses attention on what is known. Developing an expectation for surprises is key to their avoidance and requires that risk assessors specifically consider their "unknowledge"-that is, what they do not presently know about an event, outcome, or activity and its potential consequences and triggers. One way to emphasize the need for risk assessors to consider unknowledge is to explicitly include it as a separate component in risk-assessment frameworks. This article formalizes the inclusion of unknowledge in a contemporary risk-assessment framework.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.17661DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

developing expectation
8
expectation surprises
8
unknowledge contemporary
8
contemporary risk-assessment
8
risk-assessment framework
8
risk assessment
8
risk assessors
8
assessors consider
8
risk
5
sight mind
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!