AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effects of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) of pancreatic transection margins on the prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
  • A total of 311 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed, with findings categorized into three groups based on the first FSA results: negative (1FSA-R0), carcinoma in situ (1FSA-CIS), and invasive carcinoma (1FSA-IC).
  • Results showed similar median survival rates for 1FSA-R0 and 1FSA-CIS, indicating that additional resections may be justified for 1FSA-CIS, while 1FSA-IC was significantly associated with poorer survival

Article Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of additional resection based on intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) of the pancreatic transection margin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis based on the results of the first FSA of the pancreatic transection margin (1st FSA) and the clinical significance of additional resection.

Methods: Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC from 2000 to 2020 at a single center were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the 1FSA. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed according to the 1FSA.

Results: A total of 311 patients were included in this study. The 1FSA was negative in 272 patients (1FSA-R0) and positive in 39 patients [carcinoma in situ (1FSA-CIS), 21 patients; invasive carcinoma (1FSA-IC), 18 patients]. Additional resections were performed on 37 patients [1FSA-CIS, 20 patients; 1FSA-IC, 17 patients], and R0 resection was achieved in 34 patients intraoperatively. Comparing median survival time to 1FSA-R0 (36.4 months), 1FSA-CIS was comparable (27.8 months, p = 0.276), although 1FSA-IC was significantly worse (18.8 months, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, 1FSA-IC was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.68, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-6.17, p = 0.020).

Conclusions: 1FSA-CIS and 1FSA-R0 had similar OS, implying that additional resection may be acceptable for 1FSA-CIS. 1FSA-IC was still an independent prognostic factor based on additional resection, and the prognostic significance of additional resection is uncertain for 1FSA-IC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2024.10.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

additional resection
20
pancreatic transection
12
transection margin
12
patients
10
pancreatic ductal
8
ductal adenocarcinoma
8
fsa pancreatic
8
significance additional
8
1fsa-ic patients]
8
1fsa-ic independent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!