Designing nature to be a solution for climate change in cities: A meta-analysis.

Sci Total Environ

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Ecossistemas (LECE), Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Sala 224, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil; Fundação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável (FBDS), Rua Engenheiro Álvaro Niemeyer, 76, São Conrado, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil; Plataforma Brasileira de Biodiversidade e Serviços Ecossistêmicos (BPBES), Rua Charles Darwin, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • * A meta-analysis of 7163 records from 89 global studies reveals that combining NbS with traditional infrastructure is the most effective way to address multiple climate-related challenges, particularly flooding and runoff.
  • * Incorporating NbS significantly lowers the impacts of climate hazards, achieving a reduction of 18.6% compared to the 8.1% reduction from traditional strategies alone, highlighting NbS's essential role in developing resilient and sustainable cities in future climate scenarios.

Article Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are designed as a win-win strategy to address societal challenges while providing biodiversity, social, and economic benefits. However, uncertainties and gaps persist, particularly regarding the criteria that define a NbS measure and the specific requirements for a solution to be fully recognized as such, which limit the full potential of these strategies in practice. Another persistent issue is the lack of data on strategy responses across different implementation scales (local, city, regional) and climatic zones (temperate, arid, tropical). This article provides an overview of the potential of NbS to promote climate adaptation in cities. Our meta-analysis, which compiled 7163 records from 89 articles worldwide, indicates that integrating NbS strategies with traditional approaches (gray infrastructure and sustainable technologies) is the most effective response to concurrently address multiple climate-related hazards. Flooding had the highest impact at 35.7 %, followed by increased runoff at 30.5 %. Peak flow and water pollution both had an impact of 10.3 %, while temperature increase accounted for 5.7 %, and decreases in thermal comfort made up 5.0 %. We concluded that all evaluated strategies reduced the impact of climate-related hazards, but this reduction was twice as large when incorporating NbS (18.6 % vs 8.1 %). We also demonstrate that this effect is observed under projected climate scenarios, reinforcing the role of NbS in making cities more resilient and sustainable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176735DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cities meta-analysis
8
climate-related hazards
8
nbs
6
designing nature
4
nature solution
4
solution climate
4
climate change
4
change cities
4
meta-analysis nature-based
4
nature-based solutions
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!