AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to see if a treatment called rTMS could help people with fibromyalgia sleep better.
  • It involved 42 patients who either got the real treatment or a fake one, going through 20 sessions.
  • Results showed that those who received the real rTMS treatment had much better sleep quality after 1 and 3 months compared to those who didn't.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the current study was to assess the therapeutic impact of repeated low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) on sleep problems in patients with fibromyalgia.

Methods: Forty two patients with fibromyalgia who had sleep difficulties were randomly assigned to receive either real or sham rTMS treatment. Patients received 20 treatment sessions (5 sessions per week) in which 1200 rTMS pulses were applied over the rDLPFC using a frequency of 1 Hz and an intensity of 120 % of the resting motor threshold. All participants were evaluated at baseline, and then 1 month and 3 months after treatment using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) and polysomnography (PSG).

Results: There were significant time (pre, 1month, and 3 months)X group (real versus sham group) interactions in all 3 clinical rating scales; FIQ (Df = 1.425, F = 237.645, P = 0.001), PSQI (Df = 2, F = 64.005, P = 0.001), MOS-SS (Df = 2, F = 28.938, P = 0.001) due to the fact that the real group improved significantly more over time than the sham group. Similarly, the real group improved more on the PSG parameters than the sham group. The effect sizes were large both in the rating scales and PSG, indicating a substantial clinical improvement. Correlation as an exploratory analysis between the changes (pre - post 3 months) in MOS-SS and PLMs index (/h) showed significant negative correlation (r = -0.643, P = 0.002).

Conclusions: 20 sessions of LF-rTMS over rDLPFC can improve sleep quality in both subjective (PSQI and MOSS) as well as objective (PSG) rating scales.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sleep quality
12
sham group
12
rating scales
12
transcranial magnetic
8
magnetic stimulation
8
group real
8
real group
8
group improved
8
sleep
6
group
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!