Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To explore the application value of body mass index (BMI)-based kilovoltage peak (kVp) selection and contrast injection protocol combined with different adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) strengths in renal computed tomography angiography (CTA) in reducing radiation and contrast medium (CM) doses.
Methods: One-hundred renal CTA patients were prospectively enrolled and were divided into individualized kVp group (group A, n = 50) and conventional 100 kVp group (group B, n = 50), both with automatic tube current modulation and CM of Iohexol at 350 mgI/mL concentration. Group A: 70 kVp, noise index (NI) of 18 and CM dose rate of 17 mgI/kg/s for 10 s for BMI <25 kg/m2 patients; 80 kVp, NI = 17, and CM dose rate of 19 mgI/kg/s for 10 s for 25 kg/m2≤BMI≤30 kg/m2 patients. Group B: 100 kVp, 50 mL of CM at the flow rate of 4.5 mL/s. The objective image quality, effective radiation dose, CM dose, injection rate, and image quality were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups (P > .05). Compared to group B, group A significantly reduced effective radiation dose by 28.4%, CM dose by 27.2%, and injection rate by 22.7% (all P < .001). The 2 groups had similar SD values in erector spine (P > .05). Group A had significantly higher CT values, SNR, and CNR values of the renal arteries than group B (all P < .001). The 2 radiologists had excellent agreement (Kappa value > 0.8) in the subjective scores of renal CTA images and showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (4.57 ± 0.42 vs 4.41 ± 0.49) (P > .05).
Conclusions: BMI-based scan and reconstruction protocol in renal CTA significantly reduces radiation and contrast doses while maintaining diagnostic image quality.
Advances In Knowledge: (i) BMI-based individualized tube voltage selection and contrast injection protocol in renal CTA reduces both radiation and contrast doses over conventional protocol. (ii) The combination of lower kVp and higher weight ASIR-V maybe used to improve image quality in terms of contrast enhancement and image noise under lower radiation and contrast dose conditions. (iii) Renal CTA of normal size (BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2) patients acquired at low radiation dosage and low iodine contrast dose through the combination of low tube voltage and ASIR-V algorithm achieves excellent diagnostic image quality with a good inter-rater agreement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae185 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!