A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Comparative Study of Efficacy for Extra-Oral vs. Intra-Oral Mandibular Nerve Block in Arch Bar Fixation for Management of Mandibular Fractures. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two types of mandibular nerve blocks (extra-oral vs. intra-oral) in patients requiring arch bar fixation for mandibular fractures.
  • A total of 50 out of 200 patients with maxillofacial fractures were divided into two groups for this comparison, focusing on various factors such as pain levels, onset time of anesthesia, and complications.
  • Results showed that the intra-oral Gow-Gates technique had advantages in efficiency and ease of use over the extra-oral approach, which was found to be more complicated and potentially prone to complications.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of extra-oral mandibular nerve block (infra-zygomatic approach/lateral approach) vs. intra-oral (Gow-Gates) mandibular nerve block in arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures.

Methodology: A total of 200 patients reported with maxillofacial fractures. Out of them, 50 patients who required arch bar fixation for management of mandibular fractures were divided into two groups: Group I: Extra-oral and Group II: Intra-oral mandibular nerve blocks. The intra-operative pain, time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of drug administered, depth of needle insertion, repetition of injections and postoperative complications were analysed.

Results: In Group I (Extra-oral nerve block), the time of onset of anaesthesia, volume of anaesthesia administered, needle depth, number of repetition of injections and postoperative complications were more as compared to Group II. No significant difference was observed in intra-operative pain score between two groups.

Conclusion: Intra-oral approach with Gow-Gates technique seemed to be efficient and easy to operate as compared to extra-oral approach, for arch bar fixation of mandibular fractures in an output door setting, as extra-oral approach is more technique-sensitive and may lead to certain complications which require operation theatre setting with medical attention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456107PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02306-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mandibular nerve
16
nerve block
16
arch bar
16
bar fixation
16
fixation management
12
management mandibular
12
mandibular fractures
12
efficacy extra-oral
8
mandibular
8
intra-oral mandibular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!