AI Article Synopsis
- * The analysis involved reviewing 98 joint crisis plans, with common interventions including withdrawal to low-stimulation environments (64.3%), having conversations (62.2%), and going for walks (57.1%).
- * The study found a significant gender difference in the decision to use (on-demand) medication, as this was only agreed upon by males, highlighting both useful interventions and gender-specific considerations.
Article Abstract
Objective: Identification of interventions to prevent coercive measures in the event of escalating crisis situations in an inpatient acute psychiatric treatment context.
Methods: Content analysis of 98 joint crisis plans (JCP) using frequency analysis (secondary data analysis).
Results: In over half of the joint crisis plans, withdrawal to a low-stimulation environment (64.3%), a conversation (62.2%), and a walk (57.1%) were agreed upon as intervention for escalating crisis situations. A significant difference (p=0.020) was found in relation to the intake of (on-demand) medication, which was determined exclusively by males.
Conclusions: The results provide potentially helpful suggestions for escalating crisis situations and gender-specific findings with regard to the agreed interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2388-8955 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!