A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for 5-flucytosine and species as determined by EUCAST broth microdilution. | LitMetric

Objectives: EUCAST has established clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) for spp. However, limited data are available for 5-flucytosine (5-FC). We assessed the susceptibility of 5-FC against a large collection of clinical species using EUCAST methodology and determined the associated ECOFFs.

Methods: A total of 5622 isolates were collected from patients across the Netherlands between 2008 and 2024. 5-FC MICs were determined using the EUCAST microbroth dilution reference method. Furthermore, MICs were extracted from the EUCAST website. The MICs from this study and those extracted were used to determine ECOFFs and local ECOFFs (L-ECOFFs).

Results: 5-FC exhibited potent activity against , and while decreased susceptibility was observed for and The ECOFFs (mg/L) and the percentages of WT isolates for 5-FC were: : 0.5 (97.2%), : 0.5 (96.6%), : 0.5 (99.5%) and : 8 (99.4%). The L-ECOFF (mg/L) and the percentages of WT isolates for 5-FC were: : 0.25 (96.8%), : 0.25 (67.2%), : 0.25 (48.0%), : 0.25 (86.5%), : 0.125 (95.9%) and : 8 (94.2%).

Conclusions: 5-FC remains a valuable drug to manage difficult-to-treat invasive infections. susceptibility cannot be predicted based on species identification for most species, but requires MIC-testing. ECOFFs will help to interpret the MICs to support treatment decisions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450473PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epidemiological cutoff
8
cutoff values
8
determined eucast
8
mg/l percentages
8
percentages isolates
8
isolates 5-fc
8
5-fc
7
eucast
5
ecoffs
5
wild-type mic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!