This article contributes to the ongoing debate about legal liability and responsibility for patient harm in scenarios where artificial intelligence (AI) is used in healthcare.We note that due to the structure of negligence liability in England and Wales, it is likely that clinicians would be held solely negligent for patient harms arising from software defects, even though AI algorithms will share the decision-making space with clinicians.Drawing on previous research, we argue that the traditional model of negligence liability for clinical malpractice cannot be relied upon to offer justice for clinicians and patients. There is a pressing need for law reform to consider the use of risk pooling, alongside detailed professional guidance for the use of AI in healthcare spaces.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452828 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100181 | DOI Listing |
J Forensic Odontostomatol
December 2024
Department of Advanced Biomedical Science-Legal Medicine Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
The great advances in diagnostic and therapeutic skills of most sectors of medicine and dentistry have led to an increasingly greater demand from patients for accuracy, attention and diligence by healthcare workers. Dentistry is one of the branches most frequently involved in claims for damages from malpractice, especially in those sectors that are particularly costly and of significant aesthetic value. Aim of the study was to compare data of malpractice claims with those of other Authors to identify similarities and/or differences in the results and to increase epidemiological knowledge in the area of dental malpractice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Forensic Odontostomatol
December 2024
Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto.
Int Urol Nephrol
December 2024
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the lawsuits filed against urologists in Turkey, to reveal the results of these lawsuits and the sub-branch of urology they are related to, to discuss the possible reasons for the lawsuits and what can be done to prevent them.
Materials And Methods: The case outcomes obtained using the keyword "Urology" from the publicly accessible official website of the Presidency of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed by two expert urologists.
Results: Of the 215 cases reviewed, the outcomes of 25 cases that met our inclusion criteria were analyzed.
Breastfeed Med
December 2024
Division of Neonatology, Evanston, Hospital, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Recent litigation against the two major U.S. formula manufacturers regarding their products liability, in Gill v Abbott Laboratories and Watson v Mead Johnson, juries in two U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of surgical litigation cases and the risk factors that contribute to catastrophic compensation.
Methods: We downloaded and retrieved all cases related to surgical litigation cases from the China Jufaanli Database between 2008 and 2023. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors that may contribute to catastrophic compensation.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!