A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Debunking Palliative Care Myths: Assessing the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini). | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Palliative care is essential, but misconceptions limit access to services among patients and caregivers.
  • AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Google Gemini were tested for their ability to correct these myths by evaluating their responses to 30 common misconceptions.
  • Both chatbots performed well, with ChatGPT accurately classifying 28 out of 30 statements and Google Gemini achieving perfect accuracy, indicating that AI can effectively dispel myths and enhance patient education in palliative care.

Article Abstract

Palliative care plays a crucial role in comprehensive healthcare, yet misconceptions among patients and caregivers hinder access to services. Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots offer potential solutions for debunking myths and providing accurate information. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI chatbots, ChatGPT and Google Gemini, in debunking palliative care myths. Thirty statements reflecting common palliative care misconceptions were compiled. ChatGPT and Google Gemini generated responses to each statement, which were evaluated by a palliative care expert for accuracy. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, accuracy, and precision were calculated to assess chatbot performance. ChatGPT accurately classified 28 out of 30 statements, achieving a true-positive rate of 93.3% and a true-negative rate of 3.3%. Google Gemini achieved perfect accuracy, correctly classifying all 30 statements. Statistical tests showed no significant difference between chatbots' classifications. Both ChatGPT and Google Gemini demonstrated high accuracy in debunking palliative care myths. These findings suggest that AI chatbots have the potential to effectively dispel misconceptions and improve patient education and awareness in palliative care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450875PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_44_2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

palliative care
28
google gemini
20
chatgpt google
16
debunking palliative
12
care myths
12
artificial intelligence
8
intelligence chatbots
8
chatbots chatgpt
8
care
7
palliative
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!