A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Physical fitness profile of military lifeguards. | LitMetric

Physical fitness profile of military lifeguards.

Rev Bras Med Trab

Laboratório de Desempenho, Treinamento e Exercício Físico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to analyze the physical fitness of professional beach lifeguards categorized by age groups, focusing on their ability to perform water rescues.
  • Data was collected from 99 male lifeguards, including measurements of strength, body composition, and running ability on sand, with a focus on comparing younger lifeguards (20-39) to older ones (40-49).
  • The results showed younger lifeguards performed better in strength and speed tests, while handgrip strength remained consistent across ages; the authors recommend specific fitness tests for lifeguard screening.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Throughout a lifeguard's career, regardless of age, the physical demands of performing a water rescue are likely to remain constant.

Objectives: To establish a physical fitness profile by age group of a sample composed of professional beach lifeguards who regularly engage in physical activity.

Methods: One hundred and seventy-two lifeguards were initially recruited for this study. Data from 99 male lifeguards were provided for analysis. Anthropometric measurements, lower limb strength, and handgrip measurements were taken at the initial visit. During a second visit, running tests were performed on sand. All testing procedures followed the same predefined sequence for all individuals.

Results: One-way analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni or Kruskal-Wallis adjusted analysis was performed to assess differences between age groups depending on the exact variable. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. There were statistically significant differences in all power and velocity performance parameters as well as body fat percentage with better results found in the younger age groups (20-29;30-39) compared to an older age group (40-49). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for handgrip strength.

Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate significant differences in physical fitness between different age groups. The authors suggest that the squat jump, countermovement jump, 20-meter linear sprint test, zigzag change-of-direction test, and running anaerobic sprint test assessment should be used as screening tools for fitness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452121PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1123DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical fitness
12
age groups
12
fitness profile
8
age group
8
statistically differences
8
sprint test
8
age
6
physical
5
profile military
4
lifeguards
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!