Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of hemilaminectomy as an approach to intradural tumors and to assess the risk of postoperative spinal instability.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 38 patients who underwent surgical resection of intradural tumors between November 2014 and March 2019. Clinical and radiologic data were documented in medical records, from which we obtained clinical data including age, gender, tumor etiology, lesion level, type of resection, and postoperative instability during follow-up.

Results: Schwannomas and meningiomas were the most commonly treated tumors. The lesion locations were as follows: 8 cervical (21%), 19 thoracic (50%), 10 lumbar (26%), and 1 sacral (3%). The mean follow-up time was 28 months. In all cases, hemilaminectomy allowed for the removal of the tumors without clinical or radiologic evidence of postoperative mechanical instability. Hemilaminectomy was primarily performed on 2 segments but was extended to up to 6 levels in some cases.

Conclusions: Unilateral hemilaminectomy is an effective technique that facilitates complete tumor removal with a low rate of postoperative instability in the operated segments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.134DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unilateral hemilaminectomy
8
retrospective cohort
8
intradural tumors
8
clinical radiologic
8
postoperative instability
8
tumors
5
hemilaminectomy primary
4
primary treatment
4
treatment spinal
4
spinal cord
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) refers to a narrowing of the space within the spinal canal, which can occur at any level but is most common in the lumbar spine. Open laminectomy and minimally invasive laminectomy (MIL) procedures are the most common surgical gold standard techniques for treating LSS. This study aims to review clinical and biomechanical literature to draw comparisons between open laminectomy and various MIL techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a new minimally invasive spinal surgery technique (UBE) with traditional open surgery for treating lumbar burst fractures.
  • It included 61 patients divided into two groups: one treated with the UBE method and the other with a traditional surgery approach, and both groups showed similar baseline characteristics.
  • Results indicated successful surgeries with no major complications for either method, but the study focuses on comparing surgical outcomes like operation time and recovery, which will be detailed in further follow-ups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of hemilaminectomy as an approach to intradural tumors and to assess the risk of postoperative spinal instability.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 38 patients who underwent surgical resection of intradural tumors between November 2014 and March 2019. Clinical and radiologic data were documented in medical records, from which we obtained clinical data including age, gender, tumor etiology, lesion level, type of resection, and postoperative instability during follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: As advancements in cancer treatments have allowed patients with a high burden of disease to live longer, the number of patients who present with debilitating refractory pain has increased. Anterolateral cordotomy has long been used for the treatment of intractable unilateral cancer pain using either an imaging-guided percutaneous approach or an open surgical approach. In this report, we describe a novel minimally invasive modification to the open surgical approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!