A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of a semi-supervised self-adjustment fine-tuning procedure for hearing aids for asymmetrical hearing loss. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study explored a self-adjustment method for hearing aids specifically designed for individuals with asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL), focusing on its effectiveness for speech recognition in noisy environments and user preferences.
  • - Participants, who were experienced hearing aid users aged around 76, used a two-dimensional interface to separately adjust settings for each ear, leading to variations in adjustment duration and gain settings.
  • - Although users tended to increase amplification in their poorer ear, the self-adjustment did not significantly improve speech recognition in noise, indicating that while the method is usable, its impact on performance may be limited.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study investigated a previously evaluated self-adjustment procedure with respect to its applicability for asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL). Self-adjusted settings were evaluated for speech recognition in noise and sound preference.

Design: Participants were given the possibility to adjust the left and right hearing aid separately using a two-dimensional user interface. Two different adjustment sequences were tested. Realistic everyday sound scenes in a laboratory environment were presented. The difference between the ears regarding their speech recognition in noise was tested with two spatial conditions, unaided as well as with the prescriptive formula and the self-adjusted setting.

Study Sample: Nineteen experienced hearing aid users (median age 76 years) with different degrees of AHL were invited to participate in this study.

Results: Participants adjusted a higher gain slope across frequency in the worse ear than in the better one. The two adjustment sequences resulted in significantly different adjustment durations and gain settings. The difference between the ears regarding speech recognition in noise did not change with the self-adjustment. Overall, group-mean effect sizes were small compared to the parameter space.

Conclusions: The adjustment procedure can be used also by hearing aid users with AHL to find a possibly preferred gain setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2406884DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

speech recognition
12
recognition noise
12
hearing aid
12
procedure hearing
8
asymmetrical hearing
8
hearing loss
8
adjustment sequences
8
difference ears
8
ears speech
8
aid users
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!