Cardiovascular effectiveness of newer glucose-lowering agents, with and without baseline lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes: A systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials and real-world evidence.

Prim Care Diabetes

Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4WP, UK. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine if baseline use of statins affects the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of two diabetes medications: SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • The analysis included 25 studies, revealing that both SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs provided similar benefits in reducing cardiovascular and kidney risks in patients with type 2 diabetes, regardless of whether they were statin users or non-users.
  • The findings suggest that statin use does not significantly impact the effectiveness of these medications in improving cardiovascular and kidney outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Article Abstract

Background: Whether the cardiovascular treatment benefits of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) differ by baseline use of statins/lipid lowering therapy is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether baseline statin use (users vs non-users) influences the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: We identified relevant cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) and observational cohort studies from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and bibliographic searches up to March 2024. The analysis pooled study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes, categorized by baseline statin use status. We also assessed the interactions between these medications and baseline statin use by calculating and pooling the ratio of HRs (RHRs) within each trial.

Results: Twenty-five articles (13 articles comprising 6 unique CVOTs and 12 articles comprising 9 unique cohort studies) were eligible. In CVOTs of SGLT-2is, the HRs (95 % CIs) of MACE; composite of CVD death or hospitalisation for heart failure; stroke; and kidney events in statin users were 0.90 (0.82-1.00), 0.78 (0.60-1.02), 1.00 (0.77-1.31), and 0.60 (0.53-0.69), respectively. The corresponding estimates were similar in non-statin users. In CVOTs of GLP-1RAs, the HRs (95 % CIs) for MACE in statin and non-statin users were 0.81 (0.73-0.90) and 0.92 (0.77-1.11), respectively. In observational cohort studies, SGLT-2is similarly reduced the risk of several cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in both statin and non-statin users. The estimated RHRs and p-values for interaction indicated that baseline statin use status did not significantly modify the cardio-kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs.

Conclusions: Aggregate analyses of intervention and real-world evidence show that SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs provide comparable cardio-kidney benefits in patients with T2D, regardless of baseline statin use status. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024498939.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

baseline statin
20
cohort studies
12
hrs 95 %
12
non-statin users
12
type diabetes
8
cardiovascular outcome
8
outcome trials
8
real-world evidence
8
statin
8
statin users
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!