Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics.

Ultrasound Med Biol

Department of Vascular Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on the biomechanics and deformation patterns of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), highlighting that some AAAs can rupture despite being small and that size alone isn't a reliable risk indicator.
  • Researchers recorded ultrasound video clips from 50 AAA patients, analyzing the vessel wall's strain patterns and discovering that these patterns are more reproducible than traditional size-based assessments.
  • Findings suggest that using strain patterns could improve risk assessment for AAA patients, but the clinical reproducibility of the specific strain measurements was found to be poor.

Article Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%-10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.

Methods: In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.

Results: Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern "topography" (i.e., curve phases or "peaks" and "valleys") had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029-0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's ρ = 0.02, false discovery rate-p = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).

Discussion: Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

strain patterns
16
vessel wall
16
wall biomechanics
12
strain
9
abdominal aortic
8
aaa
8
aaa wall
8
risk assessment
8
aaa vessel
8
principal strain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!