A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Seasonal variability of microplastic contamination in marine fishes of the state of Gujarat, India. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looked at how microplastics (tiny plastic particles) change in amount and type in fish from December 2021 to November 2022.
  • All tested fish had microplastics in their guts and gills, with many also found in their muscles, especially after the monsoon season.
  • The study shows that most microplastics were tiny fibers, and the colors mostly included blue, red, green, and others, highlighting the pollution problem in the marine life of Gujarat's waters.

Article Abstract

Seasonal variation in microplastics abundance, occurrence, and distribution in pelagic and demersal fishes was observed in this study during December 2021 to November 2022. One hundred percent presence of microplastic in inedible (gut and gills) tissue, while 82% and 54% in edible tissue (muscle) of pelagic and demersal fishes respectively were seen. Post-monsoon period showed high prevalence of microplastics followed by monsoon and the least during pre-monsoon in both pelagic and demersal fishes. In pelagic fishes, the edible tissue had microplastics abundance of 1.56 to 13.34 numbers per 10 g of tissue whereas inedible tissue had 3.36 to 16.67 numbers per 10 g of tissue. In demersal fishes, the edible tissue had microplastics abundance of 1.04 to 5.26 numbers per 10 g of tissue while it was 2.67 to 8.34 numbers per 10 g of inedible tissue. There was significant variation in abundance of microplastic in edible and inedible tissue of all the fishes (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). The most dominant microplastics size was 0.005-0.05 mm followed by 0.05-0.5 mm and the least of greater than 0.5 mm in pelagic and demersal fishes respectively. Taking microplastic shape into consideration, the most dominant was fiber followed by fragment and the film in inedible tissue of all the fishes. The edible tissue of all the fishes had only fiber in them (100% occurrence). The dominance of blue color microplastics was observed followed by red, green, yellow, and orange at least in edible as well as inedible tissues of the fishes. More than 99% microplastics polymer observed in this study include polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS); only less than 1% was unidentified. This is the first study done on seasonal variation of microplastic in the marine fish population of Gujarat waters, Northeast Arabian Sea. The study highlights the nature of micro-pollutant in marine environments, emphasizing the need for comprehensive monitoring and management strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35208-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

demersal fishes
16
numbers 10 g
16
microplastics abundance
12
pelagic demersal
12
edible tissue
12
10 g tissue
12
inedible tissue
12
tissue
10
fishes edible
8
tissue microplastics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!