A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Tabular review of contemporary fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair experiences for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Repairing a TAAA (a type of blood vessel problem) can be tricky, and there are two main methods: open surgery, which is the traditional way, and a newer method called endovascular repair, which is less invasive.
  • Researchers looked at studies from 2010 to 2024 about the newer method’s outcomes, focusing on reports with lots of cases—at least 50.
  • The studies showed that the average patient was 71 years old, and most of them were men; there were some risks involved, but the newer method had better early results compared to the traditional surgery.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) represents a technical challenge regardless of which technique is used. Open surgical repair (OSR) is the time-tested option against which novel techniques must be compared and it is still considered the gold standard option for younger, fit patients with heritable aortic diseases. Endovascular repair offers a less-invasive alternative in patients with suitable anatomy. This article aims to present a tabular review of the contemporary published data on endovascular repair of TAAAs using fenestrated-branched techniques.

Evidence Acquisition: The published literature for single-center and multicenter studies evaluating the outcomes of FB-EVAR for TAAAs was searched using MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies published between January 1 2010 and July 11 2024, in the English language which provided data on FB-EVAR of TAAAs with more than fifty reported cases were included.

Evidence Synthesis: The average patient age at time of repair was 71 years old with majority of males (65.5%). Most patients presented with a Crawford Extent II TAAAs (21.6%), followed by Extent III (21.2%). Early mortality was 4.9% for the entire cohort. The most prevalent adverse event was acute kidney injury (9.4%), followed by spinal cord injury (8.0%).

Conclusions: FB-EVAR of TAAAs continues to evolve. Pooled analysis of early mortality and morbidity is lower in this tabular review than historical outcomes of open TAAA repair.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13168-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tabular review
12
fb-evar taaas
12
review contemporary
8
thoracoabdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysms
8
endovascular repair
8
early mortality
8
repair
7
taaas
6
contemporary fenestrated-branched
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!