Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13353 | DOI Listing |
Bioethics
January 2025
Eastern Visayas State University-Secondary Laboratory School, Tacloban City, Leyte, Philippines.
J Bioeth Inq
March 2024
Department of Social Policy, Sociology and Criminology, University of Birmingham, Muirhead Tower, Ring Road North, Birmingham, B15 2TN, United Kingdom.
Surrogacy and adoption are both family-making measures subject to extensive domestic and international regulation. In this nationally representative survey study (N = 1552), we explore public attitudes to various forms of surrogacy and adoption in the United Kingdom, in response to an early proposal to allow "double donor" surrogacy as part of the ongoing legal reform project. We sought to both gauge public moral support for adoption and surrogacy generally, the effect that prospective parents' fertility had on this support, and the extent to which the public would find equivalencies between "double donor" surrogacy (DDS) and planned private adoption (PPA) to be morally significant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioethics
September 2024
Department of Philosophy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Assisted reproduction often involves biological contributions by third parties such as egg/sperm donors, mitochondrial DNA donors, and surrogate mothers. However, these arrangements are also characterised by a biological relationship between the child and at least one intending parent. For example, one or both intending parents might use their own eggs/sperm in surrogacy, or an intending mother might conceive using donor sperm or gestate a donor embryo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!