Education Research: Educational Outcomes Associated With the Introduction of a Neurohospitalist Program.

Neurol Educ

From the Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences (S.D., B.J.S., C.A.G., K.A.K.), and Quantitative Sciences Unit (Y.W.), Stanford University, CA.

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how the establishment of a neurohospitalist (NH) service impacts neurology resident evaluations of faculty teaching before and after its implementation.
  • Researchers conducted a retrospective analysis, comparing faculty evaluations from two distinct periods: before the NH model (2010-2014) and after its implementation (2016-2018), while also examining related student evaluations and performance metrics.
  • Results showed that resident evaluations of faculty teaching significantly improved in 19 out of 27 areas post-NH service, particularly in competencies like patient care and practice-based learning, while medical student evaluations remained unchanged.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: As the prevalence of the neurohospitalist (NH) practice model grows, understanding its effect on trainee education is imperative. We sought to determine the impact of an academic NH program on neurology resident evaluations of faculty teaching.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of faculty teaching evaluations before and after the implementation of a full-time NH service. Primary outcomes were neurology resident evaluations of faculty teaching, which were compared in the pre-NH period (August 2010-July 2014) vs the post-NH period (August 2016-July 2018). In a secondary analysis, we used the difference-in-difference approach to analyze the effect of introducing the NH service on resident evaluation of faculty teaching compared with stroke and neurocritical care faculty controls. We performed an additional descriptive analysis of medical student evaluation of faculty teaching and described Residency In-service Training Exam scores and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident survey data before and after the intervention.

Results: There were 368 resident and 360 medical student evaluations of faculty teaching during the study period. Compared to the pre-NH period, the post-NH period had significantly higher resident evaluations of faculty teaching in 19 of 27 questions of faculty teaching, across 5 of the 6 ACGME core competencies. Within the competencies of patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice, the NH teaching faculty were rated significantly higher across all questions. In the difference-in-difference model, resident evaluations of faculty teaching following the implementation of the NH service remained significantly improved compared with controls in teaching evidence-based medicine, teaching diagnostic algorithms, and explaining rationale for clinical decisions. Medical student ratings of faculty teaching were unchanged in the pre-NH and the post-NH period.

Discussion: Neurology residents may benefit from the clinical expertise of NHs and their ability to teach evidence-based practice and role model systems-based practice. Given the central role NHs may play in trainee education, additional focus on both the local and national levels should be dedicated to further developing the teaching skills of NHs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441747PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

faculty teaching
36
evaluations faculty
20
resident evaluations
16
teaching
13
faculty
12
medical student
12
trainee education
8
neurology resident
8
teaching compared
8
compared pre-nh
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!