A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy with non-sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy following arterial endovascular therapy: a systematic review. | LitMetric

Objective: Sarpogrelate is a selective serotonin/5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor antagonist used in the management of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The drug has emerged as a promising choice for medical management post-endovascular therapy (EVT) due to its anti-platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction, and anti-vascular smooth muscle proliferation properties. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT following arterial EVTs in PAD.

Material And Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane were systematically searched from inception to December 2023. Any randomized controlled trial studies in English that evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT after EVT in patients with PAD was included. Data on the restenosis rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and safety parameters were extracted and studied. The pooled differences in efficacy and safety parameters between sarpogrelate-based APT and non-sarpogrelate-based APT was calculated using the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI.

Results: A total of three randomized controlled trials were included out of 354 articles obtained through a literature search. No significant differences were observed in the risk of restenosis (RR=0.74, 95% CI= 0.55-1.00, =0.954) and TLR (RR=0.76, 95% CI= 0.47-1.23, =0.476) among patients being treated with sarpogrelate and non-sarpogrelate-based APT. Likewise, sarpogrelate-based APT had a similar safety profile as non-sarpogrelate-based APT.

Conclusion: Sarpogrelate-based APT can be considered an effective alternative to clopidogrel-based conventional APT after EVTs. However, there is a huge need for a larger multicenter, multinational, and multiethnic global trial with sufficient participants in order to produce generalizable findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444540PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002373DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sarpogrelate-based apt
20
efficacy safety
16
safety sarpogrelate-based
12
anti-platelet therapy
8
apt
8
randomized controlled
8
safety parameters
8
non-sarpogrelate-based apt
8
95% ci=
8
safety
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!