ChatGPT-4 and 600 human raters evaluated 226 public figures' personalities using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. The correlation between ChatGPT-4 and aggregate human ratings ranged from = 0.76 to 0.87, outperforming the models specifically trained to make such predictions. Notably, the model was not provided with any training data or feedback on its performance. We discuss the potential explanations and practical implications of ChatGPT-4's ability to mimic human responses accurately.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443023 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae418 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
public figures'
8
figures' personalities
8
large language
4
language models
4
models humans
4
humans converge
4
converge judging
4
judging public
4
personalities chatgpt-4
4
chatgpt-4 600
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!