AI Article Synopsis

  • A pilot study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Primary Eyecare Glaucoma Service (PEGS) for low-risk glaucoma patients treated in primary care optometry.
  • Out of 98 patients, 93.8% remained suitable for primary care monitoring, with only 4.9% needing referral back to secondary care, and a high agreement rate of 97.8% was found between primary and secondary care management plans.
  • Patient satisfaction was 100%, optometrists felt confident in their care role, and the service significantly reduced carbon emissions by lowering patient travel distance compared to hospital visits.

Article Abstract

Purpose: A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of a Primary Eyecare Glaucoma Service (PEGS), with low-risk glaucoma patients being reviewed within primary care optometry.

Methods: 98 low-risk glaucoma patients were identified as suitable for monitoring in primary care and reviewed by accredited optometrists in community practice supported by a clinical management plan. Safety was assessed by reviewing concordance of management plans created by primary care optometrists and the secondary care team. Patients' and primary care optometrists' feedback were collated via surveys. Carbon emissions were calculated through comparison of patient travel to primary and secondary care.

Results: 93.8% of patients reviewed by primary care met criteria for ongoing monitoring in primary care after initial review with 4.9% of patients being recalled to secondary care due to clinical instability. Safety and efficacy were demonstrated with agreement of management plans between primary and secondary care of 97.8%, kappa =0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.60-1.00), with no patients being identified as false negatives where recall back to secondary care was required. Overall satisfaction with PEGS was 100% according to a patient survey. Respondents of the primary care optometry survey felt very or somewhat confident in delivering care, with comments suggesting they felt supported by secondary care. Carbon emissions are reduced by approximately two thirds when patients are seen in primary care versus attending the hospital.

Conclusion: PEGS is a safe and effective service, reducing the burden for secondary care, while carbon emissions are reduced due to shorter travelling distances, demonstrating environmental sustainability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621407PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03335-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
32
secondary care
24
care
15
primary
12
carbon emissions
12
primary eyecare
8
eyecare glaucoma
8
glaucoma service
8
service pegs
8
safety efficacy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!