A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study. | LitMetric

Dental fillings, frequently used in dentistry to address various dental tissue issues, may pose problems when not aligned with the anatomical contours and physiology of dental and periodontal tissues. Our study aims to detect the prevalence and distribution of normal and overhanging filling restorations using a deep CNN architecture trained through supervised learning, on panoramic radiography images. A total of 10480 fillings and 2491 overhanging fillings were labeled using CranioCatch software from 2473 and 1850 images, respectively. After the data obtaining phase, validation (80%), training 10%), and test-groups (10%) were formed from images for both labelling. The YOLOv5x architecture was used to develop the AI model. The model's performance was assessed through a confusion matrix and sensitivity, precision, and F1 score values of the model were calculated. For filling, sensitivity is 0.95, precision is 0.97, and F1 score is 0.96; for overhanging were determined to be 0.86, 0.89, and 0.87, respectively. The results demonstrate the capacity of the YOLOv5 algorithm to segment dental radiographs efficiently and accurately and demonstrate proficiency in detecting and distinguishing between normal and overhanging filling restorations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441820PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0098DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

overhanging fillings
8
normal overhanging
8
overhanging filling
8
filling restorations
8
fillings
5
overhanging
5
yolo-v5 approach
4
approach evaluation
4
evaluation normal
4
normal fillings
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!