A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Wearable Devices Based on Bioimpedance Test in Heart Failure: Clinical Relevance: Systematic Review. | LitMetric

Background: Heart failure (HF) represents a frequent cause of hospital admission, with fluid overload directly contributing to decompensations. Bioimpedance (BI), a physical parameter linked to tissue hydration status, holds promise in monitoring congestion and improving prognosis. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical relevance of BI-based wearable devices for HF fluid monitoring.

Methods: A systematic review of the published literature was conducted in five medical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase) for studies assessing wearable BI-measuring devices on HF patients following PRISMA recommendations on February 4th, 2024. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS tool.

Results: The review included 10 articles with 535 participants (mean age 66.7 ± 8.9 years, males 70.4%). Three articles identified significant BI value differences between HF patients and controls or congestive vs non-congestive HF patients. Four articles focused on the devices' ability to predict HF worsening-related events, revealing an overall sensitivity of 70.0 (95% CI 68.8-71.1) and specificity of 89.1 (95% CI 88.3-89.9). One article assessed prognosis, showing that R decrease was related to all-cause-mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.51 (95% CI 1.55-23.32; = 0.02) and the composite all-cause-mortality and HF admission with a HR of 4.96 (95% CI 1.82-14.37; = 0.01).

Conclusions: BI-measuring wearable devices exhibit efficacy in detecting fluid overload and hold promise for HF monitoring. However, further studies and technological improvements are required to optimize their impact on prognosis compared to standard care before they can be routinely implemented in clinical practice.

Prospero Registration: The search protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024509914).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440438PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2509315DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wearable devices
12
systematic review
12
heart failure
8
clinical relevance
8
fluid overload
8
promise monitoring
8
wearable
4
devices based
4
based bioimpedance
4
bioimpedance test
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!