To tell or not to tell … the patient about potential harm.

Front Nucl Med

Independent Practitioner, Madison, WI, United States.

Published: September 2023

Extravasation, as distinct from infiltration, is when a potentially toxic agent (e.g., radiographic contrast, chemotherapy, anesthesia or radionuclide) is unintentionally administered to the surrounding tissue instead of directly into the vein. There is an expectation for vascular access in interventional medicine across nearly all specialties that this high frequency, study/treatment critical procedure needs to occur with rare failure and that this failure rate should be characterized in quality assurance. This opinion piece, written by a family practitioner who has served as the chief medical officer for a not-for-profit payer, reflects on our responsibility to be aware as clinicians of known potential harm and disclose to patients before a risk has occurred and if harm has occurred. In this paper, clinical obligations of reporting will be reviewed, which are necessary to maintain and enhance our trust with our patients. In the second half, the perspectives of a not-for-profit payer chief medical officer will be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440947PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2023.1258960DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

potential harm
8
chief medical
8
medical officer
8
not-for-profit payer
8
tell … the patient
4
patient potential
4
harm extravasation
4
extravasation distinct
4
distinct infiltration
4
infiltration toxic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!