AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of bulk-fill resin composites compared to traditional incremental packing when it comes to preventing caries recurrence at gingival margins over 12 months.
  • 30 patients with two affected teeth each participated, with one tooth treated using the bulk-fill technique and the other with the incremental layering technique.
  • Results showed no significant differences in clinical and radiographic assessments between the two methods, but the biochemical evaluation indicated notable changes in MMP-9 levels, suggesting that the bulk-fill method could be quicker and equally effective.

Article Abstract

Background: Bulk-fill resin composites may suffer from recurrent caries around compound proximal restorations in posterior teeth, especially at the proximo-gingival interface.Over 12 months, will the bulk fill technique affect the caries recurrence rate at gingival margins when compared to the conventional incremental packing technique? How early will the first clinical, radiographical, and biochemical evidence of caries recurrence occur?

Methods: After randomization, in 30 patients with two compound (OM or OD) supragingival lesions, one tooth was restored using the bulk fill technique on one side (group 1) (n = 15). In contrast, the other tooth on the other side was restored utilizing the incremental layering technique (group 2) (n = 15). Both teeth received restorative material (X-tra fil, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany). The FDI criteria were used to evaluate restorations. As for the periodontal assessment, the gingival index, plaque index, papillary bleeding scoring index and periodontal pocket depth were evaluated. The gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) specimens were gathered, and MMP-9 was extracted and quantitated by ELISA. A customized radiographic template was designed, and 3D printed digital bitewing radiographs were taken. Assessments were done clinically, radiographically and biochemically at baseline (1 week) and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Data was statistically analyzed.

Results: The null hypothesis was accepted clinically; no statistically significant differences appeared between bulk and incrementally filled posterior restorations. As for the radiographic assessment, the null hypothesis was accepted except for increased periodontal ligament width at 3 months. The null hypothesis for the biochemical evaluation was rejected as there were significant changes in levels of MMP-9 at different testing times.

Conclusions: 1. With similar results but less sensitivity and significant time saving, the bulk fill technique can be considered an efficient alternative to the incremental fill technique in restoring proximal cavities. 2. Early evidence of caries recurrence can be correlated to an increase in the MMP-9 level in gingival crevicular fluid, followed by an increase in radiographic periodontal ligament width measurement.

Trial Registration: An ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, (Approval No. RECO6U/5-2022). The study was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry on 24/07/2023 with an identification number (PACTR202307573531455).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443838PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04746-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fill technique
16
bulk fill
12
caries recurrence
12
null hypothesis
12
proximal cavities
8
evidence caries
8
group n = 15
8
gingival crevicular
8
crevicular fluid
8
hypothesis accepted
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!