Background And Aims: Despite concerns on the adverse health outcomes of sarcopenic obesity (SO), exploration regarding the applicability of different diagnostic criteria and the optimal screening methods is still lacking. This study aims to compare the prevalence and diagnostic agreement of SO under four diagnostic criteria in Chongming, Shanghai, China and assess the diagnostic value of nine screening methods for SO.

Methods: The study population included older people aged ≥ 65 years. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia-2019 (AWGS-2019) was used to diagnose sarcopenia. Obesity was defined using percentage of body fat (PBF), percent of body fat exceeding the 60th percentile (60% PBF), body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). The four diagnostic criteria for SO were AWGS + PBF, AWGS + 60% PBF, AWGS + BMI and AWGS + WC. Nine screening methods were the sarcopenia questionnaire [the questionnaire with five items to screen for sarcopenia (SARC-F), the addition of calf circumference to the SARC-F (SARC-CalF), and the addition of elderly age and BMI to the SARC-F (SARC-F + EBM)] combined with commonly used obesity indicators. Cohen's kappa compared agreement between diagnostic criteria, whilst sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) compared the diagnostic value of nine screening methods.

Results: A total of 1407 older people were enrolled. The prevalence of SO ranged from 0.3 to 9.9%. The highest agreement between AWGS + 60% PBF and AWGS + PBF. When the AWGS + PBF was used as the 'gold standard' (due to its high agreement and high prevalence), SARC-CalF + PBF had the highest AUC value, and SARC-F + BMI had the highest sensitivity. The recommended cut-off values for SARC-F + BMI are SARC-F ≥ 1 score and BMI ≥ 19.845 kg/m², and the recommended cut-off values for SARC-CalF + PBF are SARC-CalF ≥ 5 score and PBF ≥ 34.55%.

Conclusion: The prevalence of SO varied greatly amongst the four diagnostic criteria. AWGS + PBF is recommended for diagnosing SO in older people. SARC-F + BMI and SARC-CalF + PBF can be used as screening methods for SO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443907PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05378-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic criteria
24
screening methods
20
older people
12
diagnostic
9
sarcopenic obesity
8
optimal screening
8
agreement diagnostic
8
diagnostic screening
8
body fat
8
criteria awgs + pbf
8

Similar Publications

Comprehensive histopathological analysis of gastric cancer in European and Latin America populations reveals differences in PDL1, HER2, p53 and MUC6 expression.

Gastric Cancer

January 2025

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA, Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Avenida Menendez Pelayo nro 4 accesorio, Valencia, Spain.

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) burden is currently evolving with regional differences associated with complex behavioural, environmental, and genetic risk factors. The LEGACy study is a Horizon 2020-funded multi-institutional research project conducted prospectively to provide comprehensive data on the tumour biological characteristics of gastroesophageal cancer from European and LATAM countries.

Material And Methods: Treatment-naïve advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients were prospectively recruited in seven European and LATAM countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/purpose: Although metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has been proposed to replace the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with new diagnostic criteria since 2023, the genetic predisposition of MASLD remains to be explored.

Methods: Participants with data of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the Taiwan Biobank database were collected. Patients with missing data, positive for HBsAg, anti-HCV, and alcohol drinking history were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Stockholm Early Detection of Cancer Study (STEADY-CAN) cohort was established to investigate strategies for early cancer detection in a population-based context within Stockholm County, the capital region of Sweden. Utilising real-world data to explore cancer-related healthcare patterns and outcomes, the cohort links extensive clinical and laboratory data from both inpatient and outpatient care in the region. The dataset includes demographic information, detailed diagnostic codes, laboratory results, prescribed medications, and healthcare utilisation data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The sarcoma ring trial: a case-based analysis of inter-center agreement across 21 German-speaking sarcoma centers.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

January 2025

Sarcoma Unit, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Purpose: The management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) improves patient survival. The German Cancer Society (DKG) certifies sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, promoting high standards of care. This study investigated the variability in treatment recommendations for localized STS across different German-speaking tertiary sarcoma centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte count to monocyte count ratio (LMR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet count multiplied by neutrophil count to lymphocyte count ratio (SII), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), packed cell volume (PCV), and plateletcrit (PCT) levels in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Materials And Methods: From March 2019 to August 2023, we screened 104 of 153 patients with stage III unresectable local advanced NSCLC and IV NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy at our hospital and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis. All patients were collected for clinical information, including baseline blood indicator (NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, CRP, RDW, PCV and PCT) levels before PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and blood indicator levels and imaging evaluation results every two cycles after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!