AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzed COVID-19 severity and outcomes in pregnant versus nonpregnant women, matching 66 pregnant women with 107 nonpregnant women based on age and health conditions.
  • - Key findings showed that pregnant women exhibited different laboratory results and radiological signs (like hazy opacities) compared to nonpregnant women, but overall severity and mortality rates were similar (4.62% for pregnant vs. 5.61% for nonpregnant).
  • - The research highlights specific differences in laboratory parameters and imaging between the two groups, indicating that pregnancy does not significantly alter COVID-19 severity or mortality outcomes.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to assess the severity and outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnant women, focusing on laboratory and radiological discrepancies between pregnant women and matched nonpregnant women. In this retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we matched 107 nonpregnant women with 66 pregnant women in terms of age, comorbidities, and the interval between symptom onset and hospital admission. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were collected, and chest CT scans were evaluated using a severity scale ranging from 0 to 5. Logistic regression and adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess the impact of various factors on pregnancy status and mortality rates. Differences in several laboratory parameters, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, liver aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, urea, triglycerides, cholesterol, HbA1c, ferritin, coagulation profiles, and blood gases, were detected. Radiologic exams revealed that nonpregnant women had sharper opacities, whereas pregnant women presented with hazy opacities and signs of crypt-organizing pneumonia. A notable difference was also observed in the pulmonary artery diameter. The mortality rate among pregnant women was 4.62%, which was comparable to the 5.61% reported in nonpregnant patients. Compared with nonpregnant patients, pregnancy did not significantly affect the severity or mortality of COVID-19. Our study revealed discernible differences in specific laboratory and imaging markers between pregnant and nonpregnant COVID-19 patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442658PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73699-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pregnant women
20
nonpregnant women
12
women
9
laboratory radiological
8
nonpregnant patients
8
pregnant
7
nonpregnant
6
laboratory
5
comparative analysis
4
covid-19
4

Similar Publications

Risk and protective factors of disease flare during pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Rheumatol

January 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Beijing, 100730, China.

To synthesize available evidence on predictive factors associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares during pregnancy, we systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through January 2024 for observational studies on risk and protective factors of SLE flares during pregnancy. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD), as well as their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to quantify effect sizes. We employed fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity assessments (I statistics).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Maternal cell-free DNA in early pregnancy for preeclampsia screening: a systematic review.

Arch Gynecol Obstet

January 2025

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Purpose: To quantify the separation between maternal blood cell-free (cf)DNA markers in preeclampsia and unaffected pregnancies and compare with existing markers. This approach has not been used in previous studies.

Methods: Comprehensive systematic literature search of PubMed to identify studies measuring total cfDNA, fetal cf(f)DNA or the fetal fraction (FF) in pregnant women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Childbirth is often characterised as a time of joy. However, some women have a traumatic birth experience, resulting in ongoing psychological symptoms of distress. This can affect women's mental and physical health in subsequent pregnancies; however, a woman-centred approach has the potential to heal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Racial inequities in pregnancy outcomes persist despite investments in clinical, educational, and behavioral interventions, indicating that a new approach is needed to address the root causes of health disparities. Guaranteed income during pregnancy has the potential to narrow racial health inequities for birthing people and infants by alleviating financial stress.

Objective: We describe community-driven formative research to design the first pregnancy-guaranteed income program in the United States-the Abundant Birth Project (ABP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To analyze the prevalence of prenatal tests of pregnant women and factors associated with variation in this prevalence in the years of the Brazilian National Health Survey 2013 and 2019.

Method: A cross-sectional study, carried out with women who underwent prenatal care, interviewed in the Brazilian National Health Survey 2013 (n = 1,851) and 2019 (n = 2,729).

Results: The most prevalent tests were urine and blood, and the least prevalent were syphilis and HIV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!