A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Effect of Probiotics on Obesity with Comorbid Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Obesity and depression frequently co-occur, and the relationship between them is bidirectional. Being obese or overweight increases the risk of depression, and conversely, depression increases the risk of obesity or overweight. Emerging clinical research has shown that probiotics may be effective in treating obesity and associated depression. Modulating gut microbiota with probiotics may improve obesity-related depression, but current evidence is inconsistent. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials examining probiotics for depression in obese adults. Mean difference (MD) in depression scores between probiotic and placebo groups was pooled across studies using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I to explain heterogeneity in meta-regression analysis. To detect the publication bias of the included studies, a funnel plot, and Begg and Egger tests, were used. Possible heterogeneity moderators were detected by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, Galbraith plot, and graphic display of study heterogeneity (GOSH) analysis. Leave-one-out and Influence analyses were performed to assess sensitivity. Five trials (n = 488) were included. Overall, probiotics did not significantly improve depressive symptoms versus placebo (MD = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.63 to 0.79, = 0.82). Considerable heterogeneity among studies was observed (I = 63%). In subgroup analyses, probiotics significantly reduced depression as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (MD = -0.60, 95% CI = -1.17 to -0.03, = 0.04) with no heterogeneity (I = 0%). Probiotics also decreased depressive symptoms after 12 weeks of supplementation (MD = -0.78, 95% CI = -1.58 to -0.01, = 0.05) versus placebo. No publication bias was found using Begg and Egger tests. The GOSH diagnostics revealed three outliers, among the clusters identified by K-means, DBSCAN (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise algorithm), and GMM (Gaussian Mixture Model) analyses. Overall, probiotics did not improve depressive symptoms in obesity. However, beneficial effects were observed with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and short-term use of probiotic. Additional rigorous randomized controlled trials are warranted to elucidate the therapeutic potential of probiotics for obesity-related depression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

depression
12
probiotics improve
12
depressive symptoms
12
probiotics
9
increases risk
8
obesity-related depression
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
publication bias
8
begg egger
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!