A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluating Feedback Comments in Entrustable Professional Activities: A Cross-Sectional Study. | LitMetric

Evaluating Feedback Comments in Entrustable Professional Activities: A Cross-Sectional Study.

J Med Educ Curric Dev

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Competency-based medical education (CBME) prioritizes skills development over time-based curricula, utilizing Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for effective trainee feedback, yet feedback quality within EPAs is still not well understood.
  • The study analyzed 1163 written feedback comments using the Quality of Assessment for Learning (QuAL) score, assessing the impact of assessment tools on feedback length and quality.
  • Results showed that EPAs provide high-quality feedback, particularly through direct and video observations, while no link was found between entrustment scores and feedback quality, suggesting further investigation is needed into the factors affecting feedback dynamics in medical education.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Competency-based medical education (CBME) has transformed postgraduate medical training, prioritizing competency acquisition over traditional time-based curricula. Integral to CBME are Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), that aim to provide high-quality feedback for trainee development. Despite its importance, the quality of feedback within EPAs remains underexplored.

Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study to explore feedback quality within EPAs, and to examine factors influencing length of written comments and their relationship to quality. We collected and analyzed 1163 written feedback comments using the Quality of Assessment for Learning (QuAL) score. The QuAL aims to evaluate written feedback from low-stakes workplace assessments, based on 3 quality criteria (evidence, suggestion, connection). Afterwards, we performed correlation and regression analyses to examine factors influencing feedback length and quality.

Results: EPAs facilitated high-quality written feedback, with a significant proportion of comments meeting quality criteria. Task-oriented and actionable feedback was prevalent, enhancing value of low-stakes workplace assessments. From the statistical analyses, the type of assessment tool significantly influenced feedback length and quality, implicating that direct and video observations can yield superior feedback in comparison to case-based discussions. However, no correlation between entrustment scores and feedback quality was found, suggesting potential discrepancies between the feedback and the score on the entrustability scale.

Conclusion: This study indicates the role of the EPAs to foster high-quality feedback within CBME. It also highlights the multifaceted feedback dynamics, suggesting the influence of factors such as feedback length and assessment tool on feedback quality. Future research should further explore contextual factors for enhancing medical education practices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437546PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205241275810DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

feedback
16
feedback quality
12
written feedback
12
feedback length
12
quality
9
feedback comments
8
entrustable professional
8
professional activities
8
cross-sectional study
8
medical education
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!