AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new surgical navigation system (VTS) in improving the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement during total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • In a trial involving 124 patients, the VTS-assisted group had a significantly higher proportion of acetabular angles within the safe zone compared to the traditional technique group (93.1% vs. 50.9%).
  • While the VTS method took longer to perform (average 112.5 minutes vs. 92.6 minutes), it did not lead to better short-term outcomes or lower dislocation rates, which remained the same across both groups.

Article Abstract

Objective: The long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) largely depends on the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement. To improve the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement, we utilized a new surgical navigation system: visual treatment solution (VTS). The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy and safety of this system in assisting THA.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty-four patients undergoing primary THAs were included. The experimental group underwent VTS-assisted THA, and the control group underwent traditional surgical techniques. The main efficacy evaluation indicators were the proportion of anteversion and inclination angles in the Lewinnek safe zone, and secondary evaluation indicators included operation time, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score, Harris score, short-form-36 (SF-36) score, and hip dislocation rate. Statistical analysis was performed mainly by t-test and chi-square test.

Results: The proportion of both anteversion and inclination angles in the safe zone was 93.1% in the experimental group and 50.9% in the control group; the difference was significant (p < 0.01). The average operation time was 112.5 min in the experimental group and 92.6 min in the control group; the difference was significant (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in WOMAC score, Harris score, or SF-36 score between the experimental and control groups at 3 months after the operation (p > 0.05). The dislocation rate was 0% in the experimental group and 1.6% in the control group; the difference was not significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: VTS-assisted THA can significantly improve the accuracy of acetabular prosthesis placement. However, there were no differences in short-term clinical outcomes or dislocation rates between the two groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608766PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.14251DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetabular prosthesis
16
prosthesis placement
16
accuracy acetabular
12
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
multicenter randomized
8
randomized controlled
8
improve accuracy
8
experimental group
8
group underwent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!