Endovascular Repair in Patients with Axillary-Subclavian Arterial Trauma.

Background: Arterial trauma of the axillary subclavian segment carries considerable morbidity and mortality risks. Surgical approaches are challenging given the hidden trajectory of these vessels, which has made the endovascular approach a valid and potentially better alternative for managing these injuries. We describe the incidence of relevant outcomes for patients with traumatic axillary and/or subclavian artery injury who underwent endovascular therapy at a tertiary care university hospital over a 15-year period in Cali, Colombia.

Methods: We conducted an incidence study based on clinical records that included patients aged 15 years or older with traumatic axillary subclavian arterial injury treated with endovascular therapy between 2008 and 2022. Vascular injuries caused by intra-arterial dialysis catheter insertion (iatrogenic) were excluded. We described clinical and imaging characteristics upon admission, perioperative findings, and the incidence of complications and in-hospital mortality, with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: We included 32 patients, 93.8% of whom were male, with a median (interquartile range) age of 30 (21-42) years. The type of trauma was penetrating in 75% of patients (62.5% corresponding to gunshot wounds) and blunt in 25%. Upon admission, 12 patients (37.5%) exhibited hard signs of vascular injury, and 20 patients (62.5%) exhibited soft signs. Fourteen patients (47%) had an Injury Severity Score greater than 15, and 12 (37.5%) had hemodynamic instability. All but 3 patients (90.6%) suffered subclavian artery injury (right 48.3%, left 51.7%), while 12.9% had axillary artery injury (one patient with both vessels affected). Intraoperative complications happened in one patient (3.1%, 95% CI: 0.2-18%). Pseudoaneurysms were identified in 11 patients (34.4%), thrombosis in 6 (18.8%), and dissection in 6 (18.8%). Three (9.4%) patients required hybrid management (endovascular therapy following conventional surgery). No cases of ischemia or amputation occurred. The length of hospital stay was 6 (3, 11.5) days. No cases of in-hospital mortality were reported (0%, 95% CI: 0.0-13.4%).

Conclusions: Endovascular treatment in trauma is a minimally invasive technique with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with arterial trauma in the axillary-subclavian segment. This should be a viable therapeutic option for selected cases.