A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Rethinking Keratoplasty for Patients with Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Early "Low Load Keratoplasty" in Contrast to Late Optical and Therapeutic Keratoplasty. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Early penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) after conservative treatment (LLKP) may offer better visual outcomes than delayed PKP.
  • A study analyzed 28 patients who underwent LLKP, showing significant improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and a low recurrence rate (4%) over an average follow-up of 53 months.
  • Results indicate that earlier PKP can lead to better visual and psychological recovery, prompting a reassessment of treatment timing for AK.

Article Abstract

Background: Early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TKP) for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is thought to have a worse visual prognosis than the delayed optical penetrating keratoplasty (OKP) after successful conservative treatment of AK. This has led to a tendency to prolong conservative therapy and delay penetrating keratoplasty in patients with AK. This retrospective series presents the results of patients with AK that underwent early penetrating keratoplasty after reducing the corneal amoeba load through intensive conservative therapy, so-called "" (LLKP).

Patients And Methods: The medical records of our department were screened for patients with AK, confirmed by histological examination and/or PCR and/or in vivo confocal microscopy, which underwent ab LLKP and had a follow-up time of at least one year between 2009 and 2023. Demographic data, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure at first and last visit, secondary glaucoma (SG), and recurrence and graft survival rates were assessed.

Results: 28 eyes of 28 patients were included. The average time from initiation of therapy to penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was 68 ± 113 days. The mean follow-up time after LLKP was 53 ± 42 months. BCVA (logMAR) improved from 1.9 ± 1 pre-operatively to 0.5 ± 0.6 at last visit ( < 0.001). A total of 14% of patients were under medical therapy for SG at the last visit, and two of them underwent glaucoma surgery. The recurrence rate was 4%. The Kaplan-Meier graft survival rate of the first graft at four years was 70%. The second graft survival rate at four years was 87.5%.

Conclusion: LLKP appears to achieve a good visual prognosis with an earlier visual and psychological habilitation, as well as low recurrence and SG rates. These results should encourage us to reconsider the optimal timing of PKP in therapy-resistant AK.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434615PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091801DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penetrating keratoplasty
20
graft survival
12
keratoplasty patients
8
acanthamoeba keratitis
8
visual prognosis
8
conservative therapy
8
follow-up time
8
survival rate
8
patients
6
keratoplasty
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!