A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Dilemma for Early-Stage Conjunctival Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: To Treat or Not to Treat? | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates the treatment options for early-stage conjunctival MALToma, highlighting a "wait and watch" approach as a potential alternative to radiotherapy due to its adverse effects.
  • The research involved 32 patients with stage T1-T2 MALToma, revealing that younger T1 patients preferred observation over treatment and showed longer relapse-free survival compared to T2 patients, although this trend wasn’t statistically significant.
  • CD43 expression may be a prognostic factor indicating a poorer survival outcome in these early-stage MALToma cases.

Article Abstract

Background: Primary ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma) is typically treated with radiotherapy. Some studies suggested a "wait and watch" approach due to the adverse effects of radiotherapy. However, the benefits of observation for localized conjunctival MALToma remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the clinical course of early-stage conjunctival MALToma, distinguish heterogeneity between T1 and T2 patients, and identify prognostic factors.

Methods: This retrospective study involved patients with stage T1-T2 conjunctival MALToma and lasted >6 months. Clinical characteristics were compared between T1 and T2 subjects. Prognostic factors were examined with Cox regression.

Results: The research comprised 32 subjects with early-stage conjunctival MALToma, of whom 25% underwent observation. No individuals expired regardless of choosing observation or radiotherapy. The T1 patients were younger ( = 0.002) and more inclined towards observation only ( = 0.035) than the T2 subjects. Despite more of the T1 patients undergoing watchful waiting than the T2 subjects, the T1 patients seemed to have longer systemic relapse-free survival than the T2 subjects (17 vs. 13 years, = 0.343). CD43 may imply poor prognosis ( = 0.049).

Conclusions: Careful observation may be suggested for early-stage conjunctival MALToma. While more of the T1 individuals were younger and chose observation than the T2 patients, survival seemed longer in the T1 subjects without significance. CD43 may indicate shorter survival in early-stage cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432810PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conjunctival maltoma
20
early-stage conjunctival
16
mucosa-associated lymphoid
8
lymphoid tissue
8
tissue lymphoma
8
conjunctival
6
maltoma
6
observation
6
patients
6
subjects
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!