AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how ozone and trimetazidine influence intestines after ischemia-reperfusion injury by examining endoplasmic reticulum stress.
  • Forty rats were divided into five groups including a control, ozone-treated, ischemia-reperfusion injury group, and two experimental groups receiving either trimetazidine or ozone after the injury.
  • Results showed that both treatments reduced markers of oxidative stress and intestinal damage, with the ozone-treated group displaying the best outcomes in terms of lower injury scores and higher antioxidant levels.

Article Abstract

Aim: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of ozone (O) and trimetazidine on the intestines following ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury through the investigation of endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Methods: Forty Sprague Dawley rats were separated into five groups. The groups were named as follows: control, O, I/R, I/R + trimetazidine (TMZ), and I/R + O. The control group had laparotomy and exploration of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) only. Furthermore, alongside laparotomy and SMA exploration, an intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of a 0.7 mg/kg ozone-oxygen (O-O) combination was given to the O group. In the experimental groups, the SMA was blocked with the silk suture ligation technique for a duration of 1 h and then restored to normal blood flow for another hour. In the I/R + O group, ozone was delivered i.p. at a dosage of 0.7 mg/kg, 30 min after ischemia. In the I/R + TMZ group, a dose of 20 mg/kg/day of trimetazidine was administered orally via gavage for a duration of 7 days, beginning 1 week prior to the induction of ischemia. Intestinal tissues were taken to assess indicators of intestinal mucosal injury and oxidative stress.

Results: The level of the lipid peroxidation marker malondialdehyde (MDA) was significantly reduced in the experimental groups as compared to the I/R group ( < 0.05). The experimental groups had considerably greater levels of glutathione (GSH), which reflects antioxidant capacity, compared to the I/R group ( < 0.05). Nevertheless, the concentration of GSH was observed to be increased in the I/R + O group in comparison to the I/R + TMZ group ( < 0.05). The histopathological damage score showed a substantial decrease in the experimental groups as compared to the I/R group ( < 0.05). The I/R + O group had the lowest injury score. The experimental groups exhibited significantly reduced positivity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78 compared to the I/R group ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for the potential advantages of utilizing ozone therapy in the treatment of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Additionally, they propose that ozone should be assessed in more extensive clinical trials in the future as a therapeutic agent that can disrupt endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430474PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom14091051DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

i/r group
28
experimental groups
20
endoplasmic reticulum
16
compared i/r
16
group 005
16
i/r
13
reticulum stress
12
group
11
intestinal ischemia-reperfusion
8
ozone therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!