Aims: The mechanisms underlying the acute decompensation of heart failure (HF) remain unclear. The present study examined intracardiac dynamics during decompensated HF using echo-vector flow mapping.
Methods And Results: Fifty patients admitted for decompensated HF were prospectively enrolled, and intracardiac energy loss (EL) was assessed by echo-vector flow mapping at admission (decompensated HF) and discharge (compensated HF). Outcome measures were average EL in the left ventricle (LV) in decompensated and compensated HF and were compared with those in 40 stable non-HF patients with cardiovascular diseases. The mean age of HF patients was 80.8 ± 12.4 years. The prevalence of both females and atrial fibrillation was 48.0%. The prevalence of HF with a reduced ejection fraction (<40%) (HFrEF) was 34.0%. The prevalence of decompensated HF classified into clinical scenario 1 was 33.3%. Blood pressure and NT-proBNP were significantly higher in decompensated HF than in compensated HF, while the ejection fraction (EF) was significantly lower. Average EL was significantly higher in compensated HF patients than in non-HF patients (40 mW/m·L vs. 26 mW/m·L, P = 0.047). A multivariable analysis identified age, systolic blood pressure, LVEF, and the absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as independent risk factors for high LV-EL regardless of the presence of HF. Furthermore, average EL in HF patients was significantly higher under acute decompensated conditions than under compensated conditions (55 mE/m·L vs. 40 mE/m·L, [+18 mE/m·L, P = 0.03]). Higher EL under decompensated HF conditions was significant in non-HFrEF (+19 mW/m·L, P = 0.009) and clinical scenario 1 (+23 mW/m·L, P = 0.008). The multivariable analysis identified eGFR as an independent risk factor for a decrease in average LV-EL under decompensated conditions.
Conclusions: Energy inefficiency in LV was apparent even in stable HF patients and significant under acute decompensated conditions, particularly in HF with preserved EF and clinical scenario 1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15034 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm
October 2024
Northwell Cardiovascular Institute, Center for Arrhythmias, New Hyde Park, New York; Department of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York.
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of cardiac ablation in which electrical fields are used to create microscopic pores in the cardiomyocyte cell membrane, resulting in cell death. Unlike traditional thermal radiofrequency and cryoablation technologies, PFA is cardiomyocyte preferential, reducing the risk of collateral damage to the esophagus and phrenic nerve. However, achieving durable lesions with PFA is dependent on the proximity to the tissue and presently approved systems do not provide contact force sensing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUltrasound Med Biol
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Objective: Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI.
Methods: We acquired high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic, Sapporo, Japan. Electronic address:
Micromachines (Basel)
September 2024
Department of AAU Energy, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark.
ESC Heart Fail
September 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!