Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to develop an understanding of patients' barriers and facilitators of conversations about dentine hypersensitivity (DH) with their dentist.
Methods: The Theoretical Domains Framework shaped the topic guide for 26 participants who were troubled (High H) or not particularly troubled (Low L) by DH. Inductive thematic analysis of anonymised, transcribed, online focus group conversations was undertaken to identify reasons for non-discussion of DH during dental consultations.
Results: Participants reported that dentists did not routinely discuss DH, nor did participants feel they could bring it up. There was a perception among participants that DH was not a 'proper' condition and DH pain was not worthy of dentists' attention. Participants reported dealing with DH through lifestyle changes, and had little faith that dentists could offer more than 'just toothpaste' and voiced a need for a 'miracle cure'. Dental anxiety was a reported barrier to conversations. A positive attitude to DH by a dental team that normalised the condition and acknowledged its impacts on patients was voiced as a potential facilitator to DH discussions.
Conclusions: DH conversations do not routinely take place in dental practice because patients believe DH is not serious, DH pain is not legitimate and there is no credible solution dentists can offer. Patients and dental teams need to be supported through behavioural science tools to change these perceptions for DH conversations to take place more routinely.
Clinical Significance: As DH cannot be diagnosed by visual inspection of teeth, patients cannot be managed unless they raise the issue of their DH with their dentist. The paper helps clinicians manage patients who are reticent to discuss DH with them and suggests how dentists may intervene to help.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105362 | DOI Listing |
Lasers Med Sci
January 2025
School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Café S/N, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
This review investigated the effects of hypersensitivity treatment on molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) using laser therapy, combined or in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities. The review was conducted according to the PICOS strategy (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) and was performed in March 2024 using the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The RoB 2 tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBDJ Open
January 2025
Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Objectives: To assess the validity of light-induced and laser-induced fluorescence devices compared to the visual-tactile method for detecting secondary caries around resin composite restorations.
Materials And Methods: The study included 20 participants with 30 resin-composite restored teeth. Restorations' margins were examined using three diagnostic methods: the visual-tactile method (FDI criteria), the light-induced fluorescence camera (VistaCam iX), and the laser-induced fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent pen), and the reference was visual inspection after removal of defective restorations.
Cureus
November 2024
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nelllore, IND.
Background: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a common condition caused by exposed dentinal tubules, often requiring treatment with desensitizing agents. This in vitro study conducted at Narayana Dental College and Hospital (Nellore, AP, IND) between January 2022 and March 2022, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two desensitizing agents, SDI Riva Star (SDI Ltd., Bayswater, VIC, AUS) and Gluma Desensitizer (Kulzer, Hanau, DEU) in occluding dentinal tubules and their long-term durability following simulated brushing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
December 2024
Clinic for Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the success of selective removal to soft dentine (SRSD) with or without calcium silicate (CS) and selective removal to firm dentine (SRFD) in permanent dentition.
Materials And Methods: Between November 2018 and March 2020, 165 posterior deep caries lesions in 134 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned into test (n = 101) and control (n = 64) groups. The control group (n = 46) received the treatment of SRFD with CS, while the test group was further randomized into two groups to receive SRSD with CS (n = 45) and SRSD without CS (n = 45).
J Clin Med
November 2024
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is an enamel defect affecting molars and incisors, often leading to hypersensitivity, enamel breakdown, and increased caries risk. Non-invasive treatments, such as casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and fluoride varnish, show potential in remineralizing affected enamel and reducing sensitivity, but their efficacy is still debated. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of CPP-ACP and other non-invasive agents in improving remineralization and reducing hypersensitivity in MIH-affected teeth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!