Causal relationship between Brugada syndrome and electrocardiogram traits: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

J Electrocardiol

Department of Cardiology, Laboratory of Heart Center, Heart Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Biomedical Engineering Technology Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

Introduction: Observational studies have suggested associations between Brugada syndrome (BrS) and electrocardiograms traits. Nonetheless, the causal relationships remains uncertain in observational studies. This study aims to investigate the causal relationships between BrS phenotypic risk and electrocardiogram traits using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and colocalization analysis.

Methods: MR analysis was performed to investigate the causal relationships between BrS phenotype risk and electrocardiogram traits (P wave duration, PR interval, QRS wave duration, ST segment duration, T wave duration, QT interval, heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability). The genetic instruments for BrS (number of cases = 12,821) were obtained from the latest GWAS. GWAS summary data of electrocardiogram traits were obtained from the MRC-IEU and GWAS catalog databases. The causal relationships were obtained through MR methods, and sensitivity analyses (e.g. Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO). Furthermore, the causal relationships were evaluated whether they were driven by one linkage disequilibrium using colocalization analysis.

Results: We found that there are positive causal relationships between BrS phenotypic risk and P wave duration, PR interval, QRS wave duration and QT interval, respectively (IVW: β = 1.238, 95 % CI = 0.857-1.619, P<0.001; IVW: β = 2.199, 95 % CI = 1.358-3.039, P<0.001; IVW: β = 0.157, 95 % CI = 0.115-0.198, P<0.001; IVW: β = 0.593, 95 % CI = 0.391-0.796, P<0.001), and there is a negative causal relationship between BrS phenotypic risk and heart rate (IVW: β = -0.023, 95 % CI = -0.03 ∼ -0.015, P<0.001). Additionally, there are bidirectional causal relationships between BrS phenotypic risk and P wave duration and PR interval, respectively (IVW: OR = 1.217, 95 % CI = 1.118-1.325, P<0.001; IVW: OR = 1.02, 95 % CI = 1.008-1.032, P = 0.001). Furthermore, colocalization analysis identified that the causal relationships between BrS phenotype risk and P wave duration, PR interval and QRS wave duration were driven by rs6790396, rs6801957 and rs6801957, respectively.

Conclusions: Bidirectional causal relationships were identified between BrS phenotypic risk and P wave duration and PR interval, respectively. There were positive causal relationships between BrS phenotypic risk and QRS wave duration and QT interval, respectively, and there is a negative causal relationship between BrS phenotypic risk and heart rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153805DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

causal relationships
24
wave duration
20
electrocardiogram traits
16
duration interval
16
relationships brs
12
brugada syndrome
8
mendelian randomization
8
observational studies
8
investigate causal
8
brs phenotypic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!