AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of variable pitch locking screws in providing better interfragmentary and plate-bone compression compared to standard locking screws in cadaver bone, focusing on biomechanical stability.
  • Nine pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were tested for differences in compression forces and overall stability using both screw types under different loading conditions.
  • Results showed that variable pitch screws provided significantly greater interfragmentary and plate-bone compression, while no significant differences were found in the stability of constructs during cyclic loading or in 4-point bending tests.

Article Abstract

Objectives: A variable pitch locking screw is intended to provide interfragmentary compression combined with fixed angle stability of locking plate constructs. The objective of this study was to compare variable pitch locking screws (3.5-mm KreuLock Ti locking compression screws, Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL) with standard locking screws (from the same manufacturer) in bicortical fixation scenarios in cadaver bone by assessing (1) interfragmentary compression and plate-bone compression and (2) construct biomechanical stability.

Methods: Nine matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens with an average age of 67.2 years (range, 37-83) were used. Interfragmentary compression and plate-bone compression associated with insertion of single bicortical screws were compared between the variable pitch and standard locking screws at increasing levels of torque. The specimens tested were distal tibiae having a simulated longitudinal fracture. Additionally, fibulae were osteotomized to create a stable longitudinal fracture pattern and were fixed with a 5-screw plate construct with either all variable pitch or all standard locking screws. One of the 5 screws was placed across the osteotomy without lagging. Fibulae were tested cyclically with axial with torsional loading to compare displacements, rotation, and loads at failure or tested in 4-point bending to compare construct stiffness and maximum force to failure.

Results: Interfragmentary and plate-bone compression forces in the distal tibia model varied across specimens but were significantly higher with variable pitch locking screws compared with standard locking screws [512 N (SD = 324 N) vs. 79 N (SD = 64 N), P = 0.002, and 242 N (SD = 119 N) vs. 104 N (SD = 123 N), P = 0.028, respectively]. In cyclic loading of fibula constructs, no significant differences were detected in construct axial displacement or angular displacement (P > 0.05). In 4-point bending, no differences were detected in maximum force or bending stiffness (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Variable pitch locking screws produced interfragmentary compression between cortices and plate-bone compression that was greater than that produced by standard locking screws. In a stable bicortical fibula fixation scenario under external loading, the stability of variable pitch locking screw constructs was similar to constructs with standard locking screws.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002869DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

locking screws
40
variable pitch
32
pitch locking
24
standard locking
24
interfragmentary compression
16
plate-bone compression
16
locking
14
screws
13
compression
9
compression construct
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!