Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To determine whether bisphosphonates and NF-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitors delay coronary artery calcification (CAC).
Design: A systematic review was conducted.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL.
Eligibility Criteria: Longitudinal studies investigating CAC progression in adults (>18 years) taking either a bisphosphonate or denosumab compared with those who did not.
Data Extraction And Synthesis: Study and participant characteristics, and primary outcome ( ∆ CAC from baseline to follow-up) were extracted. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomised Trials (RoB2) tools were used to assess the risk of bias for observational and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), respectively. Outcome measures were reported.
Results: Four observational studies and one RCT (n=377) were included. Three studies solely reported the effect of bisphosphonates on ∆ CAC; one study (n=56) demonstrated a statistically significant CAC reduction in the intervention group (-372 mm/year) compared with control (+159 mm/year) (p<0.01). One study (n=14) demonstrated a difference in ∆ CAC between intervention (+880 mm/year) versus control (+2220 mm/year), however, no p value comparing groups was reported. One study (n=115) found no statistically significant difference between intervention and control.One study (n=42) exclusively investigated the effect of RANKL on ∆ CAC; there was a statistically significant reduction in CAC at 6-month follow-up between intervention (-133±124 modified Agatston unit (AU)) and control (+188±72 modified AU), p=0.03.One study (n=150) compared both bisphosphonates and denosumab to control and found no statistically significant difference between either intervention group and control over 24 months. Meta-analysis was not performed due to limited, heterogeneous studies.
Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence supporting the correlation between bisphosphonate or RANKL inhibitor use and CAC progression. Further research is warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11429268 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084516 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!