AI Article Synopsis

  • Percutaneous PFO closure is a common procedure aimed at preventing paradoxic embolism and reducing the risk of stroke in selected patients.
  • Different guidance methods, like transesophageal echocardiography and intracardiac echocardiography, are used during the procedure, each with specific benefits and drawbacks.
  • Transesophageal echocardiography provides detailed imaging but requires additional staff and patient sedation, while intracardiac echocardiography allows a single operator to perform the procedure without needing conscious sedation.

Article Abstract

Percutaneous PFO closure is a well-established medical procedure to mitigate paradoxic embolism and the future risk of stroke in a well-selected patient clientele. When it comes to procedural guidance during PFO closure, various modalities exist, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Guidance by transesophageal echocardiography (in combination with fluoroscopy) offers high-resolution 2D/3D imaging, however, it requires the presence of a peri-interventional imager and conscious sedation (or endotracheal intubation). Intracardiac echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance can be performed by a single operator and omits the need for conscious sedation (or endotracheal intubation).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pfo closure
8
conscious sedation
8
sedation endotracheal
8
endotracheal intubation
8
practical aspects
4
aspects patent
4
patent foramen
4
foramen ovale
4
ovale closure
4
closure ultrasound
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!