Objective: To review the latest evidence on the complications of elevated intrarenal pressures (IRPs) in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and the strategies to mitigate the increase of IRP during surgery.

Methods: A literature search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases was conducted from inception to April 2024. The analysis involved a narrative review.

Results: Normal physiological IRP in an unobstructed kidney ranges from 0 to 15 mmHg (0-20cmH2O). During RIRS, dangerous IRPs are often reached, resulting in complications. These include pyelorenal reflux, which predisposes the patient to fever, urosepsis and postoperative pain, and forniceal rupture, which may result in intraoperative bleeding as well as acute kidney injury, postoperative pain, and fluid overload. To maintain safe IRP, outflow should be as close as possible to inflow. Minimizing the irrigation pressure by controlling the flow rate, reducing the pressure of the irrigant fluid, using a ureteral access sheath and maintaining an empty bladder during the procedure and, more recently, using real-time IRP monitoring are appropriate techniques to mitigate unsafe IRPs.

Conclusion: Several complications from RIRS are related to elevated IRPs. Urologists need to understand the concept of IRP in endourology, the dangers associated with an elevated IRP, and the techniques that may be used to mitigate unsafe IRPs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.09.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retrograde intrarenal
8
intrarenal surgery
8
postoperative pain
8
techniques mitigate
8
mitigate unsafe
8
irp
6
intrarenal
4
intrarenal pressure
4
pressure retrograde
4
surgery a narrative
4

Similar Publications

Stone-event-free survival after retrograde intrarenal surgery: is the stone-free-status so relevant for the future outcomes?

Int Urol Nephrol

December 2024

Department of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, 8th floor, Largo Do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.

Introduction: The primary aim of stone treatment is to achieve stone-free status. Residual fragments can cause stone growth, recurrence, urinary tract infections, and ureteric obstruction. Our goal was to describe the natural history of stone burden after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) based on stone-free status (SFS), evaluating stone growth and stone-events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate stone free rate (SFR) predictivity of three different scoring systems in patients with kidney stones larger than 20 millimeters undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery(RİRS).

Methods: Digital records of a total of 166 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Epidemiological characteristics (age, gender, medical history) of the patients, stone and affected kidney characteristics (size, volume, location, density, opaque, presence of urinary system anomaly, presence of stones in different calyx, number of stones, lower pole stone, renal infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), renal infundibulopelvic length (RIL), hydronephrosis), and operative characteristics (preoperative ureteral stent, operation duration, postoperative residual fragments, hospitalization time and complications were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current study aimed to determine the risk factors and define a new scoring system for predicting febrile urinary tract infection (F-UTI) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) by using machine learning methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent RIRS and 511 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 34 patients who developed postoperative F-UTI, and Group 2 consisted of 477 patients who did not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare stone-free rates (SFRs), operative times, and transfusion rates of various endoscopic techniques for kidney stone management.

Methods: A systematic review was performed, identifying studies comparing the different endoscopic techniques in patients with renal stones. Studies were grouped by location and size of stones (lower pole, 1-2 cm, and >2 cm).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!