AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluated an automated system for segmenting breast cancers in MRI scans and compared its effectiveness to that of radiologists across multiple clinical sites.
  • A 3D U-Net model was trained on a substantial dataset and validated against test data from different sites, showing similar performance between the AI and radiologists.
  • The findings indicate that the AI can match radiologists' segmentation accuracy and the code and model weights are shared publicly to encourage reproducibility in radiology AI research.

Article Abstract

This work aims to perform a cross-site validation of automated segmentation for breast cancers in MRI and to compare the performance to radiologists. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was trained to segment cancers in dynamic contrast-enhanced axial MRIs using a large dataset from Site 1 (n = 15,266; 449 malignant and 14,817 benign). Performance was validated on site-specific test data from this and two additional sites, and common publicly available testing data. Four radiologists from each of the three clinical sites provided two-dimensional (2D) segmentations as ground truth. Segmentation performance did not differ between the network and radiologists on the test data from Sites 1 and 2 or the common public data (median Dice score Site 1, network 0.86 vs. radiologist 0.85, n = 114; Site 2, 0.91 vs. 0.91, n = 50; common: 0.93 vs. 0.90). For Site 3, an affine input layer was fine-tuned using segmentation labels, resulting in comparable performance between the network and radiologist (0.88 vs. 0.89, n = 42). Radiologist performance differed on the common test data, and the network numerically outperformed 11 of the 12 radiologists (median Dice: 0.85-0.94, n = 20). In conclusion, a deep network with a novel supervised harmonization technique matches radiologists' performance in MRI tumor segmentation across clinical sites. We make code and weights publicly available to promote reproducible AI in radiology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01266-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

test data
12
cross-site validation
8
sites common
8
clinical sites
8
median dice
8
performance
6
segmentation
5
data
5
network
5
validation segmentation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!