Voluntary versus mandatory food labels, Australia.

Bull World Health Organ

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Ave, SydneyNSW 2000, Australia.

Published: October 2024

Objective: To compare uptake of the voluntary Health Star Rating front-of-pack nutrition labelling system with uptake of a mostly mandatory country-of-origin label in Australia over a similar period.

Methods: We used data on numbers and proportions of products carrying health stars and country-of-origin labelling recorded annually between 2015 and 2023 through surveys of four large Australian food retailers. We determined the proportion of products with health stars and country-of-origin labels for each year by dividing the number of products carrying each label by the total number eligible to carry that label.

Findings: The uptake of the voluntary Health Star Rating increased steadily between 2014 and 2018, reaching a maximum of 42% (8587/20 286) of products in 2021 before decreasing to 39% (8572/22 147) in 2023. Mandatory country-of-origin labelling uptake rose rapidly and was found on 93% (17 567/18 923) of products in 2023. In categories where country-of-origin labelling was voluntary, uptake by 2023 was 48% (3313/6925). In our 2023 sample of 22 147 products, 11 055 (50%) carried country-of-origin labelling only, 7466 (35%) carried both health star and country-of-origin labelling, 1106 (5%) carried health star labels only and 2520 (11%) carried neither label.

Conclusion: The experience with country-of-origin labelling shows that widespread and rapid food labelling change can be achieved when required by law. The Australian government should mandate the Health Star Rating without delay. Australia's experience supports other jurisdictions in implementing mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labelling as well as updates to global guidance to recognize mandatory labelling as best-practice in delivering benefits to consumers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418841PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.291629DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

country-of-origin labelling
24
health star
20
star rating
12
labelling
10
uptake voluntary
8
voluntary health
8
front-of-pack nutrition
8
nutrition labelling
8
country-of-origin
8
mandatory country-of-origin
8

Similar Publications

Unlike the mandatory information that must be provided on a food supplement label, health claims are voluntary. This study assesses the regulatory compliance of omega-3 fatty acid (ω-3-FA) supplement label claims. Of the 97 supplements, 76 (78.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Observational health research often relies on accurate and complete race and ethnicity (RE) patient information, such as characterizing cohorts, assessing quality/performance metrics of hospitals and health systems, and identifying health disparities. While the electronic health record contains structured data such as accessible patient-level RE data, it is often missing, inaccurate, or lacking granular details. Natural language processing models can be trained to identify RE in clinical text which can supplement missing RE data in clinical data repositories.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In Sweden, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are subsidized for diabetes indication but not for obesity. Unregulated off-label prescription of GLP-1 receptor agonists for obesity treatment may raise concerns about potential inequalities for both patient groups. This study aimed to describe socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of on- and off-label users of GLP-1 receptor agonists in persons without a diagnosis of diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Meta-researchers commonly leverage tools that infer gender from first names, especially when studying gender disparities. However, tools vary in their accuracy, ease of use, and cost. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost of the commercial software Genderize and Gender API, and the open-source gender R package.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revealing transparency gaps in publicly available COVID-19 datasets used for medical artificial intelligence development-a systematic review.

Lancet Digit Health

November 2024

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, AI models were developed to help with health-care resource issues, but previous studies showed that the datasets used often have limitations leading to biased outcomes.
  • A systematic review analyzed 192 healthcare datasets from MEDLINE and Google Dataset Search, focusing on metadata completeness, accessibility, and ethical considerations.
  • Results indicated significant shortfalls, including that only 48% showed the country of origin, 43% reported age, and under 25% included demographic factors like sex or race, emphasizing the need for improved data quality and transparency to avoid bias in future AI health applications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!