AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the relationship between sex, gender identity, and gender expression on cardiovascular disease risk factors in young adults, as previous research has not focused on these aspects.
  • Results show that males have elevated blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and better endothelial function compared to females, with no significant differences found based on gender expression.
  • The findings suggest that sex and gender identity influence cardiovascular health, while gender expression does not, indicating a need for further research in gender-diverse populations.

Article Abstract

Background: Sex differences exist in cardiovascular disease risk factors including elevated blood pressure and arterial stiffness, and decreased endothelial function in males compared to females. Feminine gender expression may be associated with elevated risk of acute coronary syndrome. However, no study has investigated the associations between sex, gender identity, and gender expression and cardiovascular disease risk factors in young adults.

Methods: One hundred and thirty participants (22 ± 3 years) underwent assessments of hemodynamics, arterial stiffness [pulse wave velocity (PWV)], and brachial artery endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation; %FMD). Participants completed a questionnaire capturing sex category (50 male/80 female), gender identity category (49 men/79 women/2 non-binary), and aspects of gender expression assessed by the Bem Sex Role Inventory-30 (39 androgynous/33 feminine/29 masculine/29 undifferentiated). Sex/gender identity category groups were compared using unpaired -tests and gender expression groups compared using one-way ANOVAs.

Results: Resting systolic and mean arterial pressure ( < 0.01) were elevated in males vs. females. Central PWV was elevated in males [median (interquartile range): 6.4 (1.8) vs. 5.8 (2.2) m/s,  = 0.02]; however, leg and arm PWV were not different between sexes. %FMD was elevated in males vs. females, after accounting for a larger baseline artery diameter in males (8.8 ± 3.3% vs. 7.2 ± 3.1%,  = 0.02); since the majority of participants were cisgender, the same results were found examining gender identity (men vs. women). There were no differences across gender expression groups ( > 0.05).

Conclusions: Sex/gender identity category, but not gender expression, influence cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, arterial stiffness, endothelial function) in cisgender adults; further research is needed in gender-diverse populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420989PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1374765DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gender expression
24
risk factors
16
gender identity
12
arterial stiffness
12
endothelial function
12
identity category
12
gender
9
cardiovascular risk
8
sex gender
8
identity gender
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!